25 research outputs found

    Logic and Philosophy of Religion

    Get PDF
    This paper introduces the special issue on Logic and Philosophy of Religion of the journal Sophia: International Journal of Philosophy and Traditions (Springer). The issue contains the following articles: Logic and Philosophy of Religion, by Ricardo Sousa Silvestre and Jean-Yvez BĂ©ziau; The End of Eternity, by Jamie Carlin Watson; The Vagueness of the Muse—The Logic of Peirce’s Humble Argument for the Reality of God, by Cassiano Terra Rodrigues; Misunderstanding the Talk(s) of the Divine: Theodicy in the Wittgensteinian Tradition, by Ondƙej Beran; On the Concept of Theodicy, by Ricardo Sousa Silvestre; The Logical Problem of the Trinity and the Strong Theory of Relative Identity, by Daniel Molto; Thomas Aquinas on Logic, Being, and Power, and Contemporary Problems for Divine Omnipotence, by Errin D. Clark

    Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox

    Get PDF
    In this paper we explain that the paraconsistent logic LP (Logic of Paradox) promoted by Graham Priest can only be supported by trivial dialetheists, i.e., those who believe that all sentences are dialetheias

    Ambiguous Symmetry: The Typical Case of Human Beings

    Get PDF

    Formal Approaches to the Ontological Argument

    Get PDF
    This paper introduces the special issue on Formal Approaches to the Ontological Argument of the Journal of Applied Logics (College Publications). The issue contains the following articles: Formal Approaches to the Ontological Argument, by Ricardo Sousa Silvestre and Jean-Yves BĂ©ziau; A Brief Critical Introduction to the Ontological Argument and its Formalization: Anselm, Gaunilo, Descartes, Leibniz and Kant, by Ricardo Sousa Silvestre; A Mechanically Assisted Examination of Begging the Question in Anselm’s Ontological Argument, by John Rushby; A Tractarian Resolution to the Ontological Argument, by Erik Thomsen; On Kant’s Hidden Ambivalence Toward Existential Generalization in his Critique of the Ontological Argument, by Giovanni Mion; The Totality of Predicates and the Possibility of the Most Real Being, by Srećko Kovač; An Even More Leibnizian Version of Gödel’s Ontological Argument, by Kordula ƚwiętorzecka and Marcin Ɓyczak; A Case Study On Computational Hermeneutics: E. J. Lowe’s Modal Ontological Argument, by David Fuenmayor

    Handbook of the First World Congress on Logic and Religion

    Get PDF
    This is the handbook of abstracts of the 1st World Congress on Logic and Religion, which took place in JoĂŁo Pessoa, Brazil, April 01-05, 2015

    La Pointure du Symbole

    No full text
    Dans un texte dĂ©sormais cĂ©lĂšbre, Ferdinand de Saussure insiste sur l’arbitraire du signe dont il vante les qualitĂ©s. Toutefois il s’avĂšre que le symbole, signe non arbitraire, dans la mesure oĂč il existe un rapport entre ce qui reprĂ©sente et ce qui est reprĂ©sentĂ©, joue un rĂŽle fondamental dans la plupart des activitĂ©s humaines, qu’elles soient scientifiques, artistiques ou religieuses. C’est cette dimension symbolique, sa portĂ©e, son fonctionnement et sa signification dans des domaines aussi variĂ©s que la chimie, la thĂ©ologie, les mathĂ©matiques, le code de la route et bien d’autres qui est l’objet du livre La Pointure du symbole. -/- Jean-Yves BĂ©ziau, franco-suisse, est docteur en logique mathĂ©matique et docteur en philosophie. Il a poursuivi des recherches en France, au BrĂ©sil, en Suisse, aux États-Unis (UCLA et Stanford), en Pologne et dĂ©veloppĂ© la logique universelle. Éditeur-en-chef de la revue Logica Universalis et de la collection Studies in Universal Logic (Springer), il est actuellement professeur Ă  l’UniversitĂ© FĂ©dĂ©rale de Rio de Janeiro et membre de l’AcadĂ©mie brĂ©silienne de Philosophie. SOMMAIRE -/- PRÉFACE L’arbitraire du signe face Ă  la puissance du symbole Jean-Yves BÉZIAU La logique et la thĂ©orie de la notation (sĂ©miotique) de Peirce (Traduit de l’anglais par Jean-Marie Chevalier) Irving H. ANELLIS Langage symbolique de GenĂšse 2-3 Lytta BASSET -/- MĂ©canique quantique : quelle rĂ©alitĂ© derriĂšre les symboles ? Hans BECK -/- Quels langages et images pour reprĂ©senter le corps humain ? Sarah CARVALLO Des jeux symboliques aux rituels collectifs. Quelques apports de la psychologie du dĂ©veloppement Ă  l’étude du symbolisme Fabrice CLÉMENT Les panneaux de signalisation (Traduit de l’anglais par Fabien Shang) Robert DEWAR Remarques sur l’émergence des activitĂ©s symboliques Jean LASSÈGUE Les illustrations du "Songe de Poliphile" (1499). Notule sur les hiĂ©roglyphes de Francesca Colonna Pierre-Alain MARIAUX Signes de vie Jeremy NARBY Visualising relations in society and economics. Otto Neuraths Isotype-method against the background of his economic thought Elisabeth NEMETH AlgĂšbre et logique symboliques : arbitraire du signe et langage formel Marie-JosĂ© DURAND – Amirouche MOKTEFI Les symboles mathĂ©matiques, signes du Ciel Jean-Claude PONT La mathĂ©matique : un langage mathĂ©matique ? Alain M. ROBERT

    Logica universalis: towards a general theory of logic

    No full text

    The Mystery of the Fifth Logical Notion (Alice in the Wonderful Land of Logical Notions)

    No full text
    We discuss a theory presented in a posthumous paper by Alfred Tarski entitled “What are logical notions?”. Although the theory of these logical notions is something outside of the main stream of logic, not presented in logic textbooks, it is a very interesting theory and can easily be understood by anybody, especially studying the simplest case of the four basic logical notions. This is what we are doing here, as well as introducing a challenging fifth logical notion. We first recall the context and origin of what are here called Tarski-Lindenbaum logical notions. In the second part, we present these notions in the simple case of a binary relation. In the third part, we examine in which sense these are considered as logical notions contrasting them with an example of a nonlogical relation. In the fourth part, we discuss the formulations of the four logical notions in natural language and in first-order logic without equality, emphasizing the fact that two of the four logical notions cannot be expressed in this formal language. In the fifth part, we discuss the relations between these notions using the theory of the square of opposition. In the sixth part, we introduce the notion of variety corresponding to all non-logical notions and we argue that it can be considered as a logical notion because it is invariant, always referring to the same class of structures. In the seventh part, we present an enigma: is variety formalizable in first-order logic without equality? There follow recollections concerning Jan WoleƄski. This paper is dedicated to his 80th birthday. We end with the bibliography, giving some precise references for those wanting to know more about the topic

    Logica universalis: towards a general theory of logic

    No full text
    corecore